Home
-
Arsenal
Carbines
Rifles
Modifications
Repair Guide
Waterballoons
Weapons Lab
-
Tactics
Ambushes
Battle Tactics
Command Proverbs
Defence
Night Battles
Team Commander
-
War
Battle & Game Ideas
Communication
Hosting a War
Ranger's Guide
Scout's Guide
Sniper's Guide
Videos
War Stories

Other Stuff
Links
Letter from Speedloader
You're Hardcore if...

Aquashock Arctic Blast
Statistics
-
Marketed: 2007, 2008, 2009
Classification: Rifle
Suggested Uses: Scouting, Raiding, Standard Engagements
Dimensions: 16.2" x 3.3" x 11.9"

Weight Empty: 2.34 lbm
Weight Full:
4.92 lb
Weight Full & precharged: 5.54 lb

Reservoir Volume: 39.5 oz
Firing Chamber ": 9.5 oz
Shots/Tank: 5 full, 70 burst

Nozzles: 1.4 mm, 15 mm
Output/sec; 1.4 mm:1.1 oz
Output/ sec; 15 mm  9.5 oz/(0.5 sec);*
Shot Time; 1.4 mm: 8 sec*
Shot Time; 15 mm: 0.5 sec*
Range; 1.4 mm: 36 ft*
Range; 15 mm: 35 ft*

Pump Volume: 0.65 oz
Pump Stroke Length: 4.75"
Pumps to 100%: 14-15

Ratings

Capacity ||||||||||
In. Durability ||||||||||
Ex. Durability ||||||||||
Power ||||||||||
Range ||||||||||
Soakage ||||||||||
Shot Time ||||||||||
Encumberancee ||||||||||
Overall ||||||||||


The CPS technology is a huge advantage for a gun this size. Obviously effective shot time (above 70% power) is greatly increased over similarly sized air pressure models, but output is increased also. Take for example, a comparison with the XP 310. Both blasters feature 1mm nozzles, however, the Arctic Blast's output is 37% more (1.1 vs 0.7 oz) than that of the 310. You don't have to be a physics major to understand that when nozzle size remains the same but output is increased there is more power. Thus, although the Arctic Blast's primary nozzle is rather small it still holds a decisive advantage over blasters utilizing air pressure technology.

Structural Review
The Arctic Blast is a bit of a contrast.  The external durability is incredible, I venture to say that one could run over this thing with a truck and it'd still work.  Conversley, the Max-D trigger/nozzle system is prone to breaking with repeated use.  The strain placed upon the low quality springs (one can see in the spring for the 17mm "flood" nozzle in  the picture) for each nozzle causes them to break after repeated use.  The rest of the internals are quite strong however.

As previously mentioned, the CPS technology is of great advantage over similarly sized blasters.  The black rubber cylinder type piece in the picture is the Constant Pressure System firing chamber.  It's very similar to the one contained in the SC 500 and 600.  One can "collossus" the Arctic Blast by placing rubber innertubes over the rubber CPS firing chamber, and k modding the check valve.

One can see the overall over/under layout of the blaster from this pic.  The reservoir connects to the pipe at the end of the tube with the orange cap on it at the bottom.



Pros: External durability, shot time on 1mm, CPS technology
Cons: Max D nozzle/trigger mechanism is highly likely to break over use, the weigh distribution to the bottom of the blaster may make it hard to weild with one hand, low shot time with 17mm "flood" nozzle

Recomendation: Neutral.  Qualification: Yes, if you know how to fix Max D trigger mechanisms.

In Action Photos
(click photo to view larger size):
University of North Carolina at Charlotte: Oak HallUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte: Oak HallUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte: Oak HallUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte: Oak HallUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte: Oak Hall

Modding Potential ||||||||||

* = above 70% power